« NSD 2014: Before And After | Main | Hurricanes Scalp Seminoles in Tallahassee »

February 10, 2014

Comments

roachcane77

Morning Spacers!… Off to work!

Lots o' players out there...

Let's Go Canes!

UMike

Wait... wait....are my eyes fooling me, or did I just read what I think I read? So our defense which finished dead last in the ACC is "better" according to Golden? Either he is delusional or thinks/hopes we he fans are.

Tom Hogg

I'd use the lists from ESPN, Rivals, 247, etc as toilet paper and do my own evaluating.

YooperCane

Go Canes!

SOUP

#SPINDOCTORS

CaneRock

Kudos to Michael Sam...COURAGE!

SinisterCane

Good Morning Spacers

CaneRock

Tell ya'll what, Golden wasn't lyin' about 3rd down coversions and TOP...we stunk up the place in those departments. We converted 56 outta 160 3Ds, and only had the ball for an avg. of 24 MPG. Coley needs to TIGHTEN UP!

UMike

CR,.. I have no doubt the O needs improvement, but to say the defense was "better", and AGAIN throwing the O under the bus is crazy... at least to me.

LB

"Wait... wait....are my eyes fooling me, or did I just read what I think I read? So our defense which finished dead last in the ACC is "better" according to Golden? Either he is delusional or thinks/hopes we he fans are."

The only thing I can think of is Golden's own evaluations. "Player X has his arm angle 5 more degrees to the left while tackling, therefore we have improved." Meanwhile, he ignored the fact that #DaffyDefense did worse in every category against weaker offenses.

Either way, it's madness. There is no defense. Yes, the offense needs improvement... but a quarterback who stays in a protected pocket and is accuracy-based will do that.

UMike

What do you spacers think it would take for D'No to save his job? Please dont tell me about what rank our D needs to be... our D "improved" in overall rankings (NCAA rankings) but was dead last in the ACC. I mean, yards per game, points per game, number of blow outs, number of QB's having career days etc... What improvement do you think needs to happen for him to stay?

CaneRock

UMike, I hear ya'. While Golden was correct in saying that 3Ds and TOP impacts the defense, in turn, losing your key players on offense (PD4 & Duke) effects those numbers also.

CaneRock

What improvement do you think needs to happen for him to stay?

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 08:23 AM

Hit harder thant Duke?

UMike

lol CR

jsy

I guarantee if we struggle this year golden will use the youth/inexperience not big enough excuse

UMike

jsy... I do agree there. BUT.... BUT... he made a mistake in regards to that. He admittedly said one of the main reasons he did not make a change was the youth (freshman) coming back and the incoming class. So if those players dont save D'No, Golden will be out of excuses... at least the youth excuse. That doesnt mean he wont use that excuse though lol

30CINCO

Which part of what Golden said is not true?

jsy

U remember in the beginning of the year after the uf game he lauds his players for following the scheme and process then end of year he says they are out of position and that they need to trust the process. Hows that possible? Maybe our players all had concussions and amnesia from the constantly being kicked under the buss

SOUP

For the 10,000th time: it is NOT about D'No, it is about Golden. Even he has said it a 1,000 times: THE BUCK STOPS HERE!

If the D fails over the next TWO years and Miami is losing 3-5 games a season then Golden will have to bare the consquences of his actions and decisions.

If the D improves as we ALL hope it will and Miami is winning 10-11 games a season then there will be nothing left to say about that and everyone will be happy!

Just sit back, take a deep breath and relax. The "problem" fixes itself in TWO years either way.

CaneRock

UMike, I'm being serious dawg. Even though it didn't show on the scoreboard, Duke actually HIT! FSU better than US!

And I don't know if our guys aren't watching film, or maybe they're watching film the wrong way, but CLEARLY!, the film-work didn't translate to field against VT,Duke, and Louisville.

SOUP

Maybe our players all had concussions and amnesia from the constantly being kicked under the buss

Posted by: jsy | February 10, 2014 at 08:38 AM

Maybe RCCF and WWIM ran over them in the Canespace 12% bus, then backed up and did it again, and again? LOL

UMike

Which part of what Golden said is not true?

Posted by: 30CINCO | February 10, 2014 at 08:37 AM

30.. not even going to try and answer this... if you think dead last in the ACC is "better", than there is nothing to say.

30CINCO

30.. not even going to try and answer this... if you think dead last in the ACC is "better", than there is nothing to say.

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 08:46 AM
-----------------------------------------------
100% incorrect

BC last in the ACC in YPG
VA last in the ACC in PA/G

UMike

So is "middle of the pack" in the ACC enough of an improvement? I think that would go a long way imo.... cannot have blow out losses, especially to average teams. No player should have a career day unless they are an elite talent. I think those are a couple of things hat would single a big improvement.

UMike

30, when you take the non-conference games out, and only look at the ACC games, Miami was last. LB did a whole write up on it.

30CINCO

Why are ANY games taken out? What is the reason for this?

UMike

But again, if you think the d was "better", then ok. Your opinion, no need to go back and forth. Obviously your on of the people who think ending the season with 4 blow out losses was an upward trend lol

30CINCO

Its not like every team plays the same conf schedule.

UMike

30.. LB did a comparison against ACC teams, which is the most important games. I also think it helps because we played SSU, FAU and USF. When looking at just ACC competition, we were last.

UMike

Point is, against our conference opponents, we were at our worst.

30CINCO

Its not MY opinion, ITS THE FACTS!

2012 YPG : 486.4
2013 YPG : 426.4

2012 PA/G : 30.5
2013 PA/G : 26.8

CaneRock

No player should have a career day unless they are an elite talent. I think those are a couple of things hat would single a big improvement.

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 08:49 AM

WITS!, that's what it comes down to...can D'Onofrexcuses match WITS!, with the likes of Jimbo,Petrino, and Cutcliffe. Elite talent can make ANY! DC look good, but can an elite DC, make that elite talent, look MORE elite...ala Jeremy Pruitt.

UMike

On a brighter note we did whole offensive powerhouses UVA and Pitt to 26 & 31 to end the regular season. Maybe since we didnt give up 42 or more Golden sees it as an upward trend.

Doesnt really matter now...

Go Canes


You play the schedule you play. Every team plays two or three gimmes.

Backing those out is as logical as backing out the two or three best teams you play as well.

UMike

ts not MY opinion, ITS THE FACTS!

2012 YPG : 486.4
2013 YPG : 426.4

2012 PA/G : 30.5
2013 PA/G : 26.8

Posted by: 30CINCO | February 10, 2014 at 08:58 AM

Are we really going to go here AGAIN? IF you play 3 high school teams, your numbers improve, VERY simple right?

Ok.. next convo please

UMike

OK ok ok.. enough about last years D.... my question is what do YOU THINK needs to be done, or shown that marks legit improvement and keeps D'no safe?

30CINCO

Here we go again with the facts....

Florida State : played Nevada, Bethune-Cookman, Idaho, Syracuse

Should their title be taken away?

SinisterCane

The biggest potential problem is the perception of the defensive scheme amongst the future 2014 defensive recruits, we've already had two recruits choose other schools because of it, 2014 is the crossroads for Golden in the eyes of future defensive recruits, he better implement playmaking abilities with his scheme or implements coaching changes

SinisterCane

OK ok ok.. enough about last years D.... my question is what do YOU THINK needs to be done, or shown that marks legit improvement and keeps D'no safe?

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 09:02 AM

Allow players maker to use their athletic abilities to make plays, I rather go down swingin' then standing in the corner gettin' ROCKED

UMike

30.... Im done with that part... do you want to answer my question?

30CINCO

Yes, we had 2 2014 recruits who said the scheme is an issue. It's funny because they BOTH committed knowing the D had issues. One went to a team that had a worse D and well, we know what the other did.

We also had about 14 other recruits who want to play for this D (lol).

CaneRock

"Keep D'Onofrio safe"?

UMike...you ever been fired? Did it kill you? Well ALRIGHTY! then, YOU'RE SAFE! LMAO!

LB

30, Go back to early December and see for yourself. UMike, thank you. No need to hash out. I butchered the defense, and no sane individual can defend it.

"What do you spacers think it would take for D'No to save his job?"

I've been holding off on this for a while in Soup's spirit of positivity. But I've got to be honest...

...nothing short of a top 50 defense, 10 win season, ACC title appearance, and a bowl game win will save D'Onofrio or Golden's job.

Love Al, but hate his decision making. It's as if he never heard the words "conditional loyalty." Donna Shalala will allow the program to win 8 or 9 games a year, but the alumni and consumers won't allow it. If you recall, only when the "Fire Shannon" banners vs. USF and decreasing ticket sales did Shalala act.

I hope I'm wrong, but here's my prediction (I'll save this one so we can celebrate if I'm wrong):

- UM falls short of the marks I set above. They lose a game they're not supposed to, one of those 45-41 shootouts vs. an inferior ACC opponent. The game costs us another title appearance. People stop coming to games and stop buying merchandise. The alumni calls for D'Onofrio's head. Golden defends D'Onofrio. Golden gets the axe because of his willful refusal to fire him.

I'm hope I'm wrong. I hope.

In the meantime: Michael Barrow for D.C.

SinisterCane


Yes, we had 2 2014 recruits who said the scheme is an issue. It's funny because they BOTH committed knowing the D had issues. One went to a team that had a worse D and well, we know what the other did.

We also had about 14 other recruits who want to play for this D (lol).

Posted by: 30CINCO | February 10, 2014 at 09:08 AM


So if the defense continues to have problems this year you don't think the number of recruits concern's will grow regarding the style of play

30CINCO

Posted by: LB | February 10, 2014 at 09:14 AM
-----------------------------------------------
What is the purpose of removing out of conference teams when teams do not play the same conf schedule?

30CINCO

So if the defense continues to have problems this year you don't think the number of recruits concern's will grow regarding the style of play

Posted by: SinisterCane | February 10, 2014 at 09:15 AM
----------------------------------------------
They will not, if the D struggles as much or worse, D'No will/should be fired.

UMike

I think VT was the only player who "left" because the scheme/future. I actually think it hurt us more the year before. Bethel wanted to get out of Miami.

UMike

30.. in your opinion, what would you consider not struggling on D next year?

CaneRock

UMike, nothing's changing dawg...like Golden said..."It's no secret, we're a 3-4 team now."

30CINCO

30.. in your opinion, what would you consider not struggling on D next year?

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 09:21 AM
-----------------------------------------------
Improvement in PA/G, 3rd down conv efficiency are my biggest areas of need.

UMike

Especially 3rd and long. It kills me to see a 3rd and 12 like 4 times a game and they convert lol

LB

"What is the purpose of removing out of conference teams when teams do not play the same conf schedule?"

30: here's a basic rundown.

1. I removed Savannah and Bethune from the equation because they are FCS teams.

- The defense played offenses averaging 73rd (2012? 59th).
- They played 1 top 20 offense and 7 offenses ranked 80th or below (2012? 3 top 20's and 4 ranked 80th or below).
- Despite allowing fewer points (around 4 less), the defense performed WORSE than other teams did against 7 opponents (USF, Wake, Va. Tech, Duke, Virginia, Pitt, and Louisville).
- They gave up 20+ points in every game for 10 straight games. 30+ in 6 games. 40+ in 3.
- In 68% (25 of 37) of the total games under D'Onofrio (2011-2013), the defense has surrendered at least 20 points.
- In 41% (15 of 37), at least 30.
- In 19% (7 of 37), at least 40.
- Of the FBS teams held under 20 points, only 2 had winning records: N. Carolina (2012) and Ga. Tech (2011).

30CINCO

Again, all this outrage over what Golden said, which part of it is not true?

I've heard "improvement on D is not true" : That is false

He states the offense needed to improve in 3rd down efficiency and time of possession. What part of that is not true? And who is he throwing under the bus? He already said he talked to Coley about it, and Coley knows that as well. So it's ok to point out what the defense needs to improve on, but not ok for the offense?

Explain this thought process?

jsy

I honestly think if we win 8 games no matter how bad the defense is dno is safe golden will defend him and say how it was such an accomplishment to win 8 games with a new qb and youth

jsy

The only only thing I think might get him canned is if we give up 600 plus in a game

Go Canes

I can tell national signing day has passed.

CaneRock

It's not that they're "not true", it's that their HALF TRUTHS! Duke and PD4 getting injured, had a direct impact on the offense...FACT!

Duke brings em' in the box, you go over the top...Dorsett takes em' out the box, you give it to Duke...SIMPLE!

Alex D

What's good Legion, long time no post. However, here is a fact: a mediocre defense should NEVER be acceptable at the U! Blog on.

trianglecane

last year we saw big runs up the middle during the spring game. it was a sign of things to come. I don't think we will see that this year, due to duke and yearby being out. But, with the growth of crawford and big/little back#7, if we see a lot of 8-12 yard runs we are in trouble...again.

30CINCO

So let me get this straight. The offense needs to improve on 3rd down efficiency and time of possession, this is true. Duke and Dorsett injuries had an impact on those stats, also true.

Which part of what he is saying is false?

I ask because last time I said losing those players hurt our defense, some called that an excuse. Which is it? Is it an excuse or is it the truth?

Ohio_Cane

Are we still talking about last year? Ugh

AeroCane

Defense: I agree with some of the posters, let the athletes be athletes and make plays. Our defense should NEVER be the 'career' game for any running back or quarterback. PERIOD! NO EXCUSES. Logan Thomas is a terrible QB, and our D make him look like Vinny T!
So that's what I want - a more athletic, aggressive defense that stops teams on 3rd down!
As for Offense: I am giving Coley this year - last year his hands were tied with Morris (IMO not a very good QB and injured) and it was his 1st year. I have very high hopes for his offense this year!
RB: I would like to see Brown work with Gus on running like a 'big' back. On 1st and goal, there is NO REASON Gus the Bus should not score for us.
Recruiting: I LOVE our DT, DE, and LB! Purely opinion, but I really think Wyche and Young are going to help right away!
Go Canes and have a great day!

UMike

I think its obvious the D did NOT improve. If you want to use stats, just look at LB's. It would of been dam near impossible for the stats not to improve with the schedule we had. But for me he is throwing the O under the bus because he doesnt talk about what the D does wrong. He just protects the D and says they improved and they won 9 games.. he then turns to the O and says things they need to work on. From the article I read, I didnt see where Golden said the D needed to work on anything.

30CINCO

Are we still talking about last year? Ugh

Posted by: Ohio_Cane | February 10, 2014 at 10:01 AM
-----------------------------------------------
YUP! lol.

Saw all the outrage of what Golden said, was interested to know why everyone went crazy over it.

UMike

Ohio... I tried to move on from last year, but it didnt work lol... Im asking what we on here think would mark a LEGIT improvement next season.

UMike

### Encouraging news for those who want to see UM blitz more and play more man coverage: Al Golden said last week UM will be more aggressive in its defensive approach this season.

Here's how Golden answered when WQAM’s Channing Crowder asked Golden what he says to people who criticize him about his loyalty to defensive coordinator Mark D'Onofrio.

"It doesn't have anything to do with my loyalty to D'Onofrio," he said. "It has to do with: We were better this year than last year. And two seasons ago we played 14 or 15 freshmen on defense. Now we're
better. We've been trying to add to that and improve on defense during a very difficult time.

"Here's what our defense was good enough to do last year: They were good enough to win nine. Now we've got to get better and win more games. The offense wasn't good on third down [or] time of possession. Both of those directly impact defense.

"Anybody who wants to blitz and play cover 1, who wouldn't want to do that? We feel we have a group here that is going to allow us to be more aggressive. The deeper you are, the more athletic you are, the more things you can do.

"You can call all the pressers you want. If your fourth and fifth [rushers] aren't getting there, someone is hung out to dry down the field. We've made a lot of progress there, adding 14 guys [on defense] that can help us. Most of our guys that had interceptions, sacks, caused fumbles are returning. Why would we abort right now?"

^^^ if I read that correctly there were 2-3 praises for the defense, and 2-3 excuses for the defense. A couple of the excuses were blamed on the offense. I think I have a pretty good case for the O being thrown under the bus lol

30CINCO

LB: I have no reason to doubt those stats. But again, WHY are ANY teams being removed?

At the same time, some stats have specific teams, some have generalities, did you also remove the FCS stats from the other teams?

UMike

This blog has become as soft and full of excuses as the football program. Sad.

AeroCane

1 more thing: Look at Coach L. He schemes and puts his team in position to win. Golden needs to take notes and scheme to his players and who he is playing vs the stubborn, 'I'm going to play my defense no matter what'.
NOW, maybe this year and going forward it works and we win (let's all hope) BUT that doesn't mean that the last 3 years we couldn't have done better with a more aggressive, etc defense. JMO

Ohio_Cane

U know what needs improvement? EVERYTHING! Coaching, execution, scheme, tackling, blitzing, coverage, sacks, pressure, interceptions, special teams TDs, attendance, cheerleading, etc. Oh, and WINS. Mother f@cking wins.

There. Last years discussion is over.

30CINCO

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 10:09 AM
-----------------------------------------------
Help me understand bro.

We were better this year than last year: True, more wins

And two seasons ago we played 14 or 15 freshmen on defense: True

Now we've got to get better and win more games: True

The offense wasn't good on third down [or] time of possession. Both of those directly impact defense: True

Which part is throwing the O "under the bus"? At the same time, wouldnt it also mean he threw the D under the bus by saying the D needs to improve on 3rd down defensive efficiency?

Terrance Sullivan

The team needs to improve in all 3 areas. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams need to improve, and Coaching definitely needs to improve. The End!

30CINCO

The team needs to improve in all 3 areas. Offense, Defense, and Special Teams need to improve, and Coaching definitely needs to improve. The End!

Posted by: Terrance Sullivan | February 10, 2014 at 10:19 AM
-----------------------------------------------
100% TRUE

UMike

Ohio, Ohio lol.. that is not answering the question lol

CaneRock

And as far as overall stats are concerned, they can skew things. IMO, it's not just how you improved overall, but WHOM you improved against.

For example, did we really improve that much against Duke, from 2012?

Did we close the gap against FSU, from 2012?

Do we really think that D'Onfrio, can match withs with Petrino?

30CINCO

Did Duke improve against everyone from 2012 to 2013?

Did FSU improve from 2012 to 2013?

I thought Golden was the HC, so not sure why D'No is being compared to an offensive/HC.

LB

"At the same time, some stats have specific teams, some have generalities, did you also remove the FCS stats from the other teams?"

Yes.

"This blog has become as soft and full of excuses as the football program. Sad."

Yes.

UMike

Maybe we should change the schedule and add 2 more high school teams, so when we win 10 games we can say we "improved" hahaha...

And improved Miami team wouldnt of lost to Duke (and give up 48), wouldnt of lost to a VT team we blew out the year before, wouldnt of needed last minute drives against bad UNC and WF teams and wouldnt of been embarrassed on national tv against Miamiville after having a month to prepare. Take out ND and KSU, add in SSU and FAU and there are your 2 more wins. And improved Miami team would of won the WEAK AZZ coastal division after "winning" it the year before.

We will learn a lot about Miami this next year. Hopefully we see REAL improvement against a tougher schedule. This means no blow out losses, not even to FSU. No average player having a career day. Getting off the field on 3rd down and not let the same play beat you on 3rd down over and over.

Even with the talent on D improving, im not convinced D'No or Golden can scheme or call the right plays against a decent offensive coordinator.

CaneRock

Even with the talent on D improving, im not convinced D'No or Golden can scheme or call the right plays against a decent offensive coordinator.

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM

YUP! That's it...right up there...SCHEME!

Terrance Sullivan

No whats Sad is skewing stats or just blaming one side of the ball and acting like the other side of the ball bears no blame LB. Just keeping it real. The Defense was bad last year make no mistake but your constant acting as if the offense was the greatest thing since sliced bread and never having issues with it is what some of us take issue with. Some only want to act as if the reason we were 9-4 was only because the defense let them tell it the offense was flawless. (Side Eye). Like I said all areas need to improve but let some tell it only the defense needs to improve. Its funny we can list all the defensive defiency's but as soon as someone mentions the problems on offense those get all into their feelings and thats my friends is sad. All we should care about is the team winning. Like I have said before its the Miami Hurricanes not the Miami Defense. Because until the game of football changes. U gonna need all 3 fazes to win games and titles. But I guess defense is the facet that counts it's the new day in football it no longer needs offense or special teams, just like its all about yards that has replaced the scoreboard. Welcome to the new football everyone where only yards and defense determines the winner? Sigh.

Go Canes

No one is ever going to change anyone else's mind on here. That's been proven every single time any subject comes up.

The only thing I'll say is it's wrong to back out any games from overall stats. Every team in college football plays these preseason games so unless you're doing it to every other team, let the stats be what they are.

Ohio_Cane


Ohio, Ohio lol.. that is not answering the question lol

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 10:20 AM
-------------------------------------------

It most certainly answers the question "what needs to improve?". Everything else pertaining to what rank we were in different categories are now unimportant as they are in the past. We sucked. But we sucked LAST season.

SinisterCane

I guess the new theme is "Forget what your eyes saw last year and believe we'll be better because Golden said it" that not gonna happen due to GO Canes and 30CINCO constant defense of AL golden, CR, UMike and myself will just counter their debate with the facts which just happen to be from LAST SEASON

30CINCO

"At the same time, some stats have specific teams, some have generalities, did you also remove the FCS stats from the other teams?"

Yes.

Posted by: LB | February 10, 2014 at 10:27 AM
-----------------------------------------------
I was curious, researched a couple of your stat lines.

You absolutely DID NOT remove the other teams FCS teams when looking at their ranking.

UMike

Ohio. I never asked what needs to improve.. or at least I wasnt trying to... My question was what would you consider and improvement on D next year. For example, no 40 point games would be a sign of improvement or no 500 yard games.. those would be legit signs of improvement. That is what I am asking, what would you consider an improvement next year worthy of saving D'No's job.

RCCF

I just typed my opinion but it was chewed...long and short of it was..

theU has the athletes, Always Does, the scheme sucks bottomline..

The All-World Offensive line didn't flourish because they are practicing against SwissCheese..

SwissCheese doesn't work because our players are better than the idiot scheme..

Recruits see the same and they know the players personally these kids have been playing AAU together since pups please don't be fooled they think they kids are not able to perform if they choose else where its the coach scheme not players not talkn to them and etc etc

NO MORE SWISS CHEESE PLEEEEEEEEASE..

RCCF

Go Canes

Robbie Neiswanger‏@NWARobbie·9m Bret Bielema just said RB Alex Collins has been removed from the team for the week.

30CINCO

I guess the new theme is "Forget what your eyes saw last year and believe we'll be better because Golden said it" that not gonna happen due to GO Canes and 30CINCO constant defense of AL golden, CR, UMike and myself will just counter their debate with the facts which just happen to be from LAST SEASON

Posted by: SinisterCane | February 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM
----------------------------
It's get used often when some don't really mean it, but this literally made me LOL

SOUP

Allow players maker to use their athletic abilities to make plays, I rather go down swingin' then standing in the corner gettin' ROCKED.

Posted by: SinisterCane | February 10, 2014 at 09:07 AM

I like this, I like this a LOT!

Go Canes

RCCF what are you basing your "The U has the athletes" comment on?

We had zero seniors on defense invited to the combine and had only one junior who received a draft review higher than the 5th round didnt we?

SOUP

Especially 3rd and long. It kills me to see a 3rd and 12 like 4 times a game and they convert lol

Posted by: UMike | February 10, 2014 at 09:30 AM

THIS

UMike

Go Canes.. I think what RCCF means is, this is Miami, we should ALWAYS have athletes on the football team.

Go Canes

I agree should UMike, but the last few years it's obvious we have not.

Getting there though.

SOUP

NO MORE SWISS CHEESE PLEEEEEEEEASE..

Posted by: RCCF | February 10, 2014 at 11:00 AM

What we need is some seriously SHARP cheddar!

SOUP

Coaching, execution, scheme, tackling, blitzing, coverage, sacks, pressure, interceptions, special teams TDs, attendance, cheerleading, etc. Oh, and WINS.

Posted by: Ohio_Cane | February 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM

Just do NOT mess with the tailgating.

That we have down PERFECT. LOL

UMike

Go Canes.. we have enough athletes to be better than we have been.

Go Canes

To a certain extent I agree but no invites to the combine this year and one certain one next year speaks volumes.

RCCF

GoCanes: Neither U Nor Golden can push that these kids are not elite athletes

1. Miami was not the only school chasing them
2. Miami being better on defense is purely because the schedule was watered down
3. Miami's defense was better when it was handed to Golden so where did all this supposed not ready, not good, etc etc crap come from
4. THIS IS THE U...Did U Forget we aren't entertaining bottom feeder kids we have very good football players who are being underdeveloped largely proven by so many of them progressing to great NFL players leaving us scratching our heads about why the greatness didn't flash at the U.. It is called scheme...I was a HUGE Randy supporter but guess what his issue was Development (he was horrible at it) I accept Golden but his issue is (HIS SCHEME BITES) U can't bring your piddly scheme to a place none for flying around(sure miss reading that)now that we don't (fly around) that blame goes to Al and No'D... Love It Own It. Stop Blaming the kids that U hand picked, i.e. Golden Campers....Ijs he builds this crap wall and then doesn't want to own up to it he deflects his issue off on everyone but the guilty party HIMSELF... 30 U can say it NO MORE SWISS CHEESE...If U call getting better playing more inferior opponents SURE we got better there U go 30.

RCCF...Bring back the real games and Flying Around and Oh Yea NO MORE SWISS CHEESE!!

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007