« TLuv Shows The U Some Love | Main | Love Me Some Larranaga »

January 23, 2015

Comments

SinisterCane

1

Terrance Sullivan

Let's go Canes. Let's kick arse in track and field baby.

TLuv

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1nZC6EybMM

CoCane

Hoops team @Syracuse today 4pm. A win today would be a good resume win. I like their chances today...

Clwtrdan

Wow. 6'-8" is the best high jumper we have? I hope he is not on scholarship. Njoku better get out there quickly.

Go,GoCanes!

@KirkHerbstreit: “@dylangerr3: @KirkHerbstreit thoughts on Brad Kaaya?” Future superstar. Big fan of his game and mentality.

CaneRock

RIP Ernie Banks.

nemo2002

Thanks for the track and field coverage.

Go,GoCanes!

@mattyports: I'll make a Bold Prediction™ and say Jordan Scarlett sticks with Miami. Heard and seen much lately that leads me to believe this.

1mg of Epi

Why SF kids aren't going to Miami, in their own words..

https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/85471-see-why-top-SOFLA-athletes-are-not-coming-to-Miami

Go,GoCanes!

Where's the video of the ones who are?

TonyCane

Looking back on the season, I found the entire year odd. Although the Canes finished with an absurd 7 losses, there were numerous times (apart from the final three games of the season) that I felt the team as a whole was playing better than I had seen during Golden's tenure. That too sounds absurd. But then I looked I looked at the numbers.

First, here's the average points scored, points allowed, and margin of defeat annually in Miami's losses since 2004:

2004 (3): 18 PF, 23 PA, 05 point deficit
2005 (3): 07 PF, 21 PA, 15 point deficit
2006 (6): 12 PF, 20 PA, 08 point deficit
2007 (7): 14 PF, 34 PA, 20 point deficit
2008 (6): 23 PF, 33 PA, 10 point deficit
2009 (4): 21 PF, 31 PA, 10 point deficit
2010 (6): 19 PF, 32 PA, 13 point deficit
2011 (6): 23 PF, 29 PA, 06 point deficit
2012 (5): 18 PF, 37 PA, 17 point deficit
2013 (4): 20 PF, 42 PA, 22 point deficit
2014 (7): 21 PF, 33 PA, 12 point deficit

Looking at the performance during Canes losses, Miami was considerably closer than in previous years. The Canes were never blown out, which is another stat:

Number of blowouts (3 TD or more loss)

2004 (3): none
2005 (3): 1
2006 (6): 1
2007 (7): 3
2008 (6): 1
2009 (4): 1
2010 (6): 1
2011 (6): none
2012 (5): 2
2013 (4): 2
2014 (7): none

This speaks again to something that has been spoken of much on this blog in the last six months - that we could have won all of our games. We out talented all but FSU, and had the Seminoles in a position to beat them. So what went wrong?


Ranking the top 5 years for Canes defense between 2004-2014 by category:

PASS DEFENSE:
Avg Comp, Attempts, Yards, TDs Given Up:
1) 2005 (3): 11-26, 143 yards, 1 TD
2) 2010 (6): 13-25, 177 yards, 1 TD
3) 2008 (6): 12-24, 178 yards, 1 TD
4) 2014 (7): 15-23, 179 yards, 1 TD
5) 2006 (6): 13-24, 195 yards, 1 TD

*2012 and 2013 were the worst statistically during this time period

RUSH DEFENSE
Avg Attempts, Yards, Yards per Carry, TDs
1) 2006 (6): 32-071, 2.2, 1 TD
2) 2007 (7): 40-154, 3.8, 2 TD
3) 2009 (4): 41-161, 3.9, 1 TD
4) 2005 (3): 44-163, 3.7, 2 TD
5) 2011 (6): 40-169, 4.3, 1 TD

Note: 2014's rush defense placed 7th in the 2004-2014 time period

FIRST DOWNS GIVEN UP
Avg First Downs Passing, Rushing, Penalties
1) 2006 (6): 07, 05, 1
2) 2005 (3): 07, 10, 2
3) 2009 (4): 09, 08, 1
4) 2007 (7): 11, 08, 1
5) 2008 (6): 07, 11, 2
5) 2004 (3): 10, 10, 1

Note: 2014 ranked 7th in the 2004-2014 time period


PENALTIES
Average Number, Yards Given Up
1) 2006 (6): 4-31
2) 2011 (6): 5-40
3) 2008 (6): 5-44
5) 2004 (3): 6-45
5) 2007 (7): 6-45

Note: Again, the 2014 squad ranked 7th in the 2004-2014 time period

TURNOVERS RECOVERED
Average Fumbles Recovered, Interceptions
1) 2004 (3): 1 Fumble, 1 Int
1) 2007 (7): 1 Fumble, 1 Int
1) 2008 (6): 1 Fumble, 1 Int
1) 2009 (4): 1 Fumble, 1 Int

Four squads, including the 2014 version combined for just 1 TO recovered. Two had none.

Turning to the offense, how did the 2014 version perform during this eleven year slice in losses?

OFFENSIVE PERFORMANCE DURING LOSSES
PASSING
Average Comp, Attempts, Yards, TDs Given Up:
1) 2014 (7): 20-34, 270 yards, 2 TD
2) 2013 (4): 19-33, 264 yards, 2 TD
3) 2011 (6): 20-31, 264 yards, 2 TD
4) 2004 (3): 19-37, 241 yards, 1 TD
5) 2010 (6): 20-40, 241 yards, 1 TD


RUSHING PER LOSS
Avg Attempts, Yards, Yards per Carry, TDs
1) 2010 (6): 33 att, 167 yards, 5.0 ypc, 1TD
2) 2011 (6): 31 att, 149 yards, 4.8 ypc, 1TD
3) 2007 (7): 39 att, 117 yards, 3.0 ypc, 1TD
4) 2014 (7): 29 att, 115 yards, 4.0 ypc, 1TD
5) 2012 (5): 29 att, 113 yards, 3.9 ypc, 1TD

FIRST DOWNS GAINED PER LOSS
Avg Passing, Rush, Penalties, Total
1)2010 (6): 12 Pass, 08 Rush, 2 Pen, 22 Ttl
2)2014 (7): 11 Pass, 06 Rush, 1 Pen, 19 Ttl
2)2011 (6): 10 Pass, 07 Rush, 2 Pen, 19 Ttl
4)2009 (4): 12 Pass, 05 Rush, 1 Pen, 18 Ttl
5)2004 (3): 12 Pass, 04 Rush, 0 Pen, 16 Ttl
5)2008 (6): 09 Pass, 06 Rush, 1 Pen, 16 Ttl

AVERAGE PENALTIES PER LOSS
1) 2013 (4): 3-26 yards
2) 2009 (4): 6-41 yards
3) 2012 (5): 6-45 yards
4) 2007 (7): 6-46 yards
5) 2008 (6): 5-47 yards
5) 2006 (6): 6-47 yards

The 2014 squad again ranked 7th in the 2004-2014 time period.

AVERAGE TURNOVERS PER LOSS
Average Fumbles, Interceptions, Total

The 2014 squad was tied with five other squads to average 1 turnover per game in a loss, which was the best during this time period.

Only missing variables are time of possession and turnovers that led to touchdowns.

The overall yearly stats can be found at:

http://canespace.typepad.com/canespace/2015/01/blogger-profile-sinister-cane/comments/page/3/#comments

Again, I don't know the Xs and Os like others here (VA). Statistically this was a much more competitive Miami team in the losses that they sustained. Statistically, it's hard to see why they lost 7 games when the team was better.

🐜🌀


Where's the video of the ones who are?

Posted by: Go,GoCanes! | January 24, 2015 at 01:20 PM

This is why people jab at you, your antagonizing comments. But if your over the age of 30 then you probably already know that about yourself.

RCCF

Those Videos Speak Volumes....

1mg of Epi

Where's the video of the ones who are?
Posted by: Go,GoCanes! | January 24, 2015 at 01:20 PM

Why?

We've been losing more SF talent the we've been getting. it's valuable to understand why, especially on the heels of a losing season after which no staff changes were made.


1mg of Epi

Again, I don't know the Xs and Os like others here (VA). Statistically this was a much more competitive Miami team in the losses that they sustained. Statistically, it's hard to see why they lost 7 games when the team was better.
Posted by: TonyCane | January 24, 2015 at 01:41 PM

Many of us have been saying all year that statistics are meaningless. 15th best D? Lol

The stats look better because the talent on the field has progressively improved. The losses occur because the talent can't overcome the scheme. The defense gives us long drives by design. The O slow down play to protect the D.

A 4 yard rush is considered a won down in our scheme. Drives are stopped when the O makes a mistake not when the D makes a play... By design. The offense takes what it's given and The net result is an inability to get off the field.

The offense is designed to take pressure of the defense, hence the check-with-me to run the clock down, and riding the the running back for far too long. The net result is explosive players forced to play slow, in order to keep the ball away from the opposing O.

And so we go 6-7 with 9 or so NFLers.

Go,GoCanes!

Posted by: 🐜🌀 | January 24, 2015 at 01:45 PM

And if a SF kid commits and never waivers like Perry and someone writes that they're wondering what he's been watching?

What does that say?

CaneRock

TonyCane...even if you don't understand the Xs & Os, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand, that you don't leave the Center uncovered against GT...or to put LBs on slot WRs against damn near every team...and then when the season's over, the HC wants to bitch & gripe about only having 5 DBs, well NO $H!T SHERLOCK, you have 250lb LBs COVERING EM'!

CaneRock



Posted by: 1mg of Epi | January 24, 2015 at 02:33 PM

IOWs, EVERYTHING has to be PERFECT. Good damn post.

TLuv

Testing like this can give you more knowledge on players and a competitive advantage on the field. These are things UM should invest in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmkMlY06_nU

Dude on a Pale Horse

My daughter is evil. She like running me over in her car and then when I pretend to be roadkill she takes off her shoe and hits me in the head with it to finish me off. She laughs the whole time.

🐜🌀


And if a SF kid commits and never waivers like Perry and someone writes that they're wondering what he's been watching?

What does that say?

Posted by: Go,GoCanes! | January 24, 2015 at 02:37 PM

Same thing.


As a fan (which everyone on here is at the end of the day) you have to support the team regardless. I'm a death do us part CANE. So I do all the time. Know do I like Golden? Hell no!!! Is the administration a total joke? Absolutely. But again Im stuck loving these canes. I've called out to many bandwagon gator/fsu clowns when there team make it to the top.

BEERicane

LeCompte is garbage

Go,GoCanes!

Just at hit a huge 3.

BEERicane

Also had one drained in his 5'8" eye right after that.

So really didn't do much.

BEERicane

Nice road win for the Canes.

VfB_Cane

Canes win!

mi@mic@ne

Canes silenced the crowd...it sounded like somebody died...woooooo

nemo2002

Big road win for the Canes before 30,000+ 'Cuse fans.

toledocane

Nice bball road win!

TonyCane

Many of us have been saying all year that statistics are meaningless. 15th best D? Lol

The stats look better because the talent on the field has progressively improved. The losses occur because the talent can't overcome the scheme. The defense gives us long drives by design. The O slow down play to protect the D.

A 4 yard rush is considered a won down in our scheme. Drives are stopped when the O makes a mistake not when the D makes a play... By design. The offense takes what it's given and The net result is an inability to get off the field.

The offense is designed to take pressure of the defense, hence the check-with-me to run the clock down, and riding the the running back for far too long. The net result is explosive players forced to play slow, in order to keep the ball away from the opposing O.

And so we go 6-7 with 9 or so NFLers.

Posted by: 1mg of Epi | January 24, 2015 at 02:33 PM

That was a good explanation. Numbers do not show everything. The "the check-with-me to run the clock down" is an interesting point. I've wondered what was up with that the last two years. Others on the blog have said it was merely to give Kayaa and Morris the freedom to audible based on what the defense was giving them. It seemed distruptive to the flow of the offense.

nemo2002

Any recruiting news?

BigWindyCane1

Love Coach L. Seems to get the most out of his players. Each player may be limited, but he accentuates what they do well and does not put them in a position to loose or fail. He is definitely the best Canes coach and one of the best in college basketball.

Go,GoCanes!

You don't win 550 being an ok coach.

Ohio_Cane

nemo2002
Any recruiting news?

Posted by: nemo2002 | January 24, 2015 at 06:42 PM
-------------------------------------------

We're back in it with Torrance Gibson. How's THAT for news? Lol

Just set his OV to UM

86Cane

NEW BLOG IS UP!!!

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007