« No Laterals Needed | Main | Read All About It: Canes Will Beat Noles Convincingly »

October 05, 2017

Comments

canezilla

BLAM

canezilla

PLAY IT AT 10AM, SO WE CAN WACH THE REST OF THE GAMES

itsa_canes_thing

So does FSU not want to change game time due to weather giving them a possible advantage?

58 Straight

I think it will be a noon game.

RCCF

OH SHIT....U CHOSE ME!!!!!!


Thanks Guys!!

12%

VfB_Cane

Now at last I realized what RCCF stands for ... Thanks for the article.

Although I half expected Soup to post another one in the "will win convincingly" series.

raizecane

If you win the coin toss, do you defer to second half or decide to have wind at your back in 4th quarter?

Sinistercane1

28-24 CANEZ

orange 'n green in the vein

Posted by: RCCF | October 05, 2017 at 11:43 AM

Uh, they're the road favorite so they're considered a two score better team. Hope got nothing to do with it.

It's not going to come down to a kick Noel, wind behind the kicker in the last 15 minutes won't matter.

RCCF

OGV oh yea it does....

In my eyes we are Always the Favorite..
Problem is we just happen to not show up when we play these idiots.
HOPE is what I stand on so that they don't do the Golden Dance
I just wanna see them be who we know they are!!

12%

58 Straight

Thanks Guys!!

12%

Posted by: RCCF | October 05, 2017 at 11:43 AM

No Sir, Thank You!

58 Straight

It's not going to come down to a kick Noel, wind behind the kicker in the last 15 minutes won't matter.

Posted by: orange 'n green in the vein | October 05, 2017 at 12:05 PM

Correctamundo!

58 Straight

Although I half expected Soup to post another one in the "will win convincingly" series.

Posted by: VfB_Cane | October 05, 2017 at 11:52 AM

Oh it's coming on Game Day, just U wait and see.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Any win, no matter how large or small will feel like we've shook off a decade of defeat. Just like the bowl win, beating FSU has turned into a critical, program building goal. We must win even though it is not a must win.

Sarasota 'cane

"Just win baby!"

Go 'canes!!

LSU Hires Richt in 2018

I see yall delusional Miami fans talking about LSU. Maybe you should know that LSU is talking strongly about firing Coach Orgeron and hiring Mark Richt before the season is over.

How bout dat!!!!

Dude on a Pale Horse

^^^ The most pathetic troll attempt in the history of this blog. You better hope we dont raid your staff once the firings start raining down on your dead program.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Wow, looks like bipartisan support for a ban on bump stocks.

30CINCO

Two UM recruits choose other schools, FBI probe a factor

http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/college/acc/university-of-miami/article177179581.html

Go Canes!

Trolling has been pathetic lately.

58 Straight

Wow, looks like bipartisan support for a ban on bump stocks.

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 12:56 PM

I think even people who usually support the 2nd Amendment realize that SOME new gun control measures need to be strongly considered at this time. I support banning "bump stocks" and magazines over 20 rounds and other reasonable actions like say limiting the # of guns one can own to say 10 and after that then you have to get an additional "collectors license" and go under additional scrutiny and screening or something like that. I cannot think of a reason why an average citizen would need to own 40+ guns, that should be a red flag unless a "collector" status is achieved and monitiored.

1mg of Epi

Posted by: 1mg of Epi | October 05, 2017 at 07:05 AM

Oooohhhhh! Too soon, soooo wrong, lol.

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 10:23 AM

Says the guy who insisted I post it?

Sarasota 'cane

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 12:55 PM

That's not an LSU fan, that's Gator Douche. He's been here since the Sun Sentinel days. He was "Toledo Fan" a few weeks ago. It's so pathetic at this point he barely deserves a mention.

Go Canes!

Posted by: 58 Straight | October 05, 2017 at 01:19 PM

Agree 100%

Anyone with a rational mind understands we need sensible gun control. No one needs a gun that can do what that maniac's was doing.

But sadly no one will give an inch on either side. Republicans won't give enough and Democrats will ask too much.

Then all everyone will do is yell and not listen.

Again.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Posted by: 58 Straight | October 05, 2017 at 01:19 PM

I have long said, if we as the gun community are not open to new regulations, and are willing to better regulate ourselves, then those that are aginst us will find the support to regulate us, and we may not like how they do it. the gun community deserves every regulation coming their way.

As far as I'm concerned, ban and confiscate bump stocks & binary triggers.

Go Canes!

Posted by: 1mg of Epi | October 05, 2017 at 01:29 PM

This made me lol.

Sarasota 'cane

Posted by: 58 Straight | October 05, 2017 at 01:19 PM

Register the guns like cars and require an insurance policy for each gun just like a car. Require a license with training just like a drivers license. Do you all realize that WE are paying $400,000 on average per shooting victim x 78,000 victims a year? More american's are killed in 1.5 years than were killed in the entire Vietnam War. Over 400,000 American's have been killed by guns since 9/11.
It's nuts and it doesn't have a damn thing to do with the 2nd Amendment. I believe in the right to bear arms, but I also believe in the right not to be killed by them as well.

Sarasota 'cane

2:00pm update looks good regardless of the kickoff time.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at1+shtml/233944.shtml?cone#contents

Sarasota 'cane

And one final rant. The NRA is not the NRA of our youth. I'm not sure where they spun out but they are completely out of control with their policies and spending. Do you all realize that Paul Ryan tabled legislation on Tuesday that the NRA was pushing to allow anyone to purchase and use silencers? They do not have our best interests at heart.

Go Canes!

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 01:41 PM

Awesome, awesome post.

Innocent bystander

Is it true that LSU is contacting Richt?

Sarasota 'cane

I feel really guilty looking at that storm track and worrying about a football game when from my point of view Nate is looking like Katrina II. A Cat 2-3 in that area is like a CAT 4-5 in the Florida Peninsula with regards to flooding and whatnot. No telling what it will do when it hits the Gulf Stream. God Bless anyone in the path of this storm.

TruCane81

^^^ The most pathetic troll attempt in the history of this blog. You better hope we dont raid your staff once the firings start raining down on your dead program.

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 12:55 PM


Rumph and Banda better finsih strong cause Corey Raymond would look real good 8n Orange and green.

orange 'n green in the vein

Posted by: RCCF | October 05, 2017 at 12:24 PM

They've got two strings of seven in the all time series . . . and Miami is still playing to keep the all time series lead from slipping to exactly .500 over the overall record. So they show up more often than not, actually.

Your eyes don't set gambling lines for good reason because last year felonious sexual-assault university covered once in two tries as a home dog. The only one they won was in Miami Gardens in the bowl, not in the aluminum bench filled crap bowl with the porta-potties everywhere around the outside on campus.

TruCane81

My bad Dude copied reply to wrong post.

CaneRock

I think we need gun regulation also, but there's not much you can do against a mass murderer that boxes you in and has His way. Remember, Mateen & Paddock scouted their killing grounds...and IIRC, both venues were one way in, one way out.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 01:51 PM

Silencers are a creation of Hollywood. I can understand the logic behind deregulating them, but the climate has changed, its a good idea to table that bill.

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 01:41 PM

Its long been time to register them, license and permit the user, but insurance I think is a step too far, unless you are advocating that the feds or state govs get involved in insurance?

Posted by: Go Canes! | October 05, 2017 at 01:40 PM

Epi completes me.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Posted by: TruCane81 | October 05, 2017 at 02:28 PM

All good, totally agree with you. Anyone else freaking out over LSU getting in contact with Richt? Lmfao! LSU cant even troll like a big program.

30CINCO

Blake James
@CanesAllAccess
The @CanesFootball game on Saturday vs #BeatFSU will stay as scheduled with a 3:30 kick. #LetsGoCanes

Dude on a Pale Horse

Posted by: CaneRock | October 05, 2017 at 03:13 PM

I think the idea is that the more reasonable hoops gun buyers have to jusmp through, then maybe the better chance the government has to find them. Bottom line is we have to find a balance between the 2A and public safety and right now we are way out of whack!

Dude on a Pale Horse

NRA now says bump stocks should get regulated.

Sarasota 'cane

Its long been time to register them, license and permit the user, but insurance I think is a step too far, unless you are advocating that the feds or state govs get involved in insurance?

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 03:18 PM

Not the government per se, rather any insurance company willing to underwrite a policy that passes the expense of owning these guns back onto the consumers that use them. If you don't drive a car you don't pay for accidents, theft, and injury caused by a car. Yet the TRUE cost of gun ownership is being passed on to every American citizen whether they own a gun or not.

It would also cut down on the # of weapons that someone would purchase if there is a residual expense to gun ownership, which would ultimately cut down on the total # of guns in circulation.

WE...you, me, and everyone else are on the hook for the medical expenses for up to 78,000 shooting victims a year to the tune of about $400,000 per victim. That's an average as some of these victims are costing us a lot more.

We need a vehicle that transfers the expense of gun ownership away from the taxpayer and back to the consumers of these products just like we do with automobiles. This isn't rocket science and it in no way infringes on a person's 2nd Amendment rights.

30CINCO

Sports Illustrated @SInow
Miami is as good as it’s been in years, but for The U, being good and being β€˜back’ are very different things

https://www.si.com/college-football/2017/10/05/miami-hurricanes-the-u-mark-richt?utm_campaign=sinow&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&xid=socialflow_twitter_si

1mg of Epi

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 01:51 PM

Silencers are a creation of Hollywood. I can understand the logic behind deregulating them, but the climate has changed, its a good idea to table that bill.

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 01:41 PM

Its long been time to register them, license and permit the user, but insurance I think is a step too far, unless you are advocating that the feds or state govs get involved in insurance?

Posted by: Go Canes! | October 05, 2017 at 01:40 PM

Epi completes me.

Posted by: His Royal Dudeness | October 05, 2017 at 03:18 PM

πŸ‘¬πŸ‘¨β€β€οΈβ€πŸ’‹β€πŸ‘¨

RCCF

We WIN....

Im going BIG Too!!

35-7

12%

I was hella close with my 42-10 last week...

This is NOT FSU that we know it..They are a shell of that!

Dude on a Pale Horse

Posted by: Sarasota 'cane | October 05, 2017 at 03:54 PM

You could potentially render the 2A unaffordable. Not a plan that would likely gain much support.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Also if no insurance company offers coverage on assault weapons, then millions would be in violation of the law.

Dude on a Pale Horse

Based on your numbers, the average gun owner would spend $115 per year on gun insurance, about $10 per month. I think that cost could be put into types of weapons maybe. Really no sense in insuring a hunting rifle or shotgun. Also, it may motivate people to support laws that keep guns off the streets as that is where the overwhelming bulk of gun crimes are committed. I dont think it would gain a lot of support though I do think you have a point.

Sarasota 'cane

Last post on topic, I swear. Some would choose not to pay the added expense just like some choose not to own a car. You could exempt bolt action rifles and double barrel shotguns used for hunting, and revolvers for personal protection. It's the weapons of war that have found their way into the personal gun locker that is the real problem.

The reality is that the $700 AR15 or Glock you can buy today has an adjusted cost closer to $15-20,000 per gun that is being passed on to you and me in the form of higher taxes. I'm simply proposing that these costs be transferred back to the consumers of these products. That is how it is supposed to be done in a free market economy.

Now back to the regularly scheduled football banter...

CaneRock

Great points Sota, never looked at it that way.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2007